Harold
W. Murray, Associate Cartographic Engineer
U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey
The significance of Cape Mendocino and the nearby area to navigators
using these waters is a classic example of the use of submarine
and shore configuration in position determination. The Pacific
Coast Pilot describes the cape as a “mountainous headland”
and “famous landmark of the old Spanish navigators”.
The cape is a turning point for nearly all vessels bound north
or south and, in view of the dangers in this vicinity, must
be approached with great caution in thick weather because the
currents and irregular bottom tend to make the ordinary methods
of navigation uncertain. It is also in a region of great climatic
change, and the meteorological conditions northward of the cape
are quite different from those to the southward. Fog, for example,
is more prevalent to the southward, whereas rainfall is heavier
and the northwesterly winds of summer are more violent to the
northward. The combined in fluence of these factors on navigation
is emphasized by the number of wrecks which occurred during
the earlier years of the present century when the then existing
hydrographic surveys were so woefully inadequate.

The
Mendocino Escarpment. The initial indication of the great
seafloor
fracture zones. Surveyed by GUIDE between 1935-1938
|
A vessel running the courses commonly used
in this locality would approach Cape Mendocino from the north
on a course of 176° and would expect to pass about six miles
off the cape to clear safely the known dangers. When the cape
is abeam and bearing about East, the course would be changed
to 160, a 16 change to the East. That is, to exaggerate, one
might say that a vessel has to run out and around the cape,
keeping six miles off. It is evident that if one did not run
far enough or, in other words, changed course too soon, the
vessel would run onto the shoals or onto the cape itself. The
currents in this locality are strong and variable, some wind
effects are little known, and fog is more prevalent than in
most places on the coasts of the United States, there usually
being approximately 1,300 hours of fog per year. A vessel passing
the cape may well have been running for many hours in a fog
without sight of any fixed object and be entirely dependent
on dead reckoning and soundings for an approximate position.
It was during a period of foggy weather in
the year 1916 that the master of the Steamer BEAR, “when
his reckoning put him about 15 miles northward of Cape Mendocino,
began to take soundings to locate his position” and feel
his way to the lightship anchored off the cape. The soundings
immediately indicated that the vessel was proceeding over deep
water of 100 fathoms or more. When the depths began to shoal
from 80 fathoms to 34 fathoms and subsequent soundings showed
substantially deeper water, it appeared from the published chart
then in use that the vessel had safely passed the cape and the
course was changed as usual. About an hour later the vessel
stranded two miles north of the cape wit ha loss of six lives.
The contributing factor in the disaster was that the misleading
soundings had been obtained in a reported but unsurveyed and,
consequently, inadequately charted submarine depression (Eel
Canyon) several miles northward of Cape Mendocino. ( See Coast
and Geodetic Survey Special Publication No. 48 (1918), “The
Neglected Waters of the Pacific Coast”, for details of
this and other incidents.)
Between the years 1899 and 1917, 15 wrecks
of strandings occurred in this area and an additional 50 occurred
at other points along the California coast. Accidents off the
coats of Oregon and Washington in this period totaled 26 and
15 respectively. In each case the lack of hydrographic surveys,
insufficient knowledge of currents, and inadequate charts were
the contributing not necessarily the sole factors involved.
Hydrography previously executed by the Coast
and Geodetic Survey in the vicinity of Cape Mendocino, aside
from earlier reconnaissance surveys, consisted principally of
1:!0,000 and 1:20,000 scale surveys accomplished between the
years 1872 and 1886. These surveys, generally speaking, extended
from six to eight miles offshore and included the heads of all
submarine depressions terminating within the above mentioned
limits. All soundings were vertical casts and probably did not
exceed 20,000 in number.
It was not until the years 1919 to 1921 that
the Coast and Geodetic Survey Ships WENONAH and LYDONIA, R.R
Lukens and E.H. Pagenhart commanding, surveyed the offshore
area of Cape Mendocino and for a distance of at least 67 statute
miles. The deeper offshore soundings, totaling about 6,500,
were obtained by the laborious and time-consuming vertical cast
method, horizontally controlled in part by dead reckoning and
by three-point fixes on shore objects. The intensity of hydrography
was naturally limited by the methods used, by the length of
time available, and by the funds allotted to the vessels, but
was accepted as adequate for the needs of navigation and there
heretofore reported but mysterious Eel Canyon was now definitely
surveyed and firmly secured within the confines of a geographic
projection.
In 1935 the Coast and Geodetic Survey’s
plan of making modern and more intensely developed surveys,
a project begun in 1932 at the southern limit of the State of
California, had progressed northward to the vicinity of Cape
Mendocino. The submarine topography revealed in the waters contiguous
to the cape is shown by the submarine contours in the accompanying
illustration.
The hydrography represented in the illustration
was obtained at selected intervals during the period from 1935
to 1938 by the Coast and Geodetic Survey Ship GUIDE, F.H. Hardy,
O.W. Swainson, and E.W. Eickelberg commanding. These surveys
consisted of three series. One series of nine 1:10,000 and one
1:20,000 scale surveys embracing the area between the shore
line and the 20-fathom curve consisted of 48,000 soundings.
The second series was composed of one 1:20,000 and three 1:40,000
scale surveys extending from the 20-fathom curve to distances
of three to seven statute miles offshore and consisting of about
25,00 soundings. The last series consisted of one 1:120,000
scale survey with about 7,000 soundings extending from the last
mentioned limits to more than 66 miles offshore. In all, a total
of more than 80,000 soundings have been taken within the area
of the illustration. The soundings obtained are principally
echo soundings supplemented by vertical cast and hand lead soundings
in the waters adjacent to the shore line. Horizontal control
consisted of three-point fix angles on shore objects in the
inshore area and radio acoustic ranging in the offshore area.
The contour interval shown on the illustration
is 100 fathoms (600 feet) for depths of 100 to 1,800 fathoms.
In depths less than 100 fathoms the 10-, 20-, 30-, 40-, 50-,
and 75-fathom contours are shown. The contour interval used
in the 1:120,00 scale survey previously mentioned was 25 fathoms,
or four times greater. This insured a more accurate contour
delineation in areas where echo soundings were practically continuous
on rather widely-spaced sounding lines.
The diversity of submarine topography expressed
in the illustration is self-evident. Heading the list is the
long submarine scarp one-half to one mile in height extending
more than 66 statute miles from shore. The western extremity
of this feature has not as yet been ascertained. Portion of
the face of the scarp plunge downward to the north with a steepness
of from 24 to about 100 percent. The downward slope of the top
of this scarp, measured from the closed 200-fathom contour to
the closed 800-fathom contour, is 1.7 per cent. However, from
the western extremity of the 800-fathom contour to the western
limit of the 1,000-fathom contour (outside the limit o the illustration),
the rate of descent has increased to 3.9 per cent. The ocean
bottom to the north and northeast of the scarp is quite flat
and about one and three-fourths miles below the surface of the
ocean, whereas the bottom to the south of the scarp slopes gently
southwestward at a rate of 3.8 to 7.6 per cent accompanied by
a depth change of from one-fifth to two miles. This scarp with
the three types of contrasting topography constitutes a submarine
feature too unusual to possess a known rival on the entire West
Coast.
The 100-fathom contour closely approximates
the limit of the continental shelf which is broader on the north
than on the south. The continental slope beginning at the 100-fathom
contour slopes away in the broader areas at a rate of about
4.3 per cent just above Spanish Canyon and is as great as 11
to 19 per cent on either side of Bear Seavalley where it is
considerably shorter in length. Here again contrasting topography
is presented in that the rate of slope on the north is about
three to four times greater than that to the southward.
Submarine canyons are well entrenched on either
side of the scarp and protrude several miles into the continental
shelf. Mattole and Delgada canyons to the southward of the cape
are remarkable in that they extend so close to shore. Eel Canyon
on the north has a broad head about five miles wide with five
pronounced tributaries. It traverses a distance of 32 statue
miles between the 30- and 1,400-fathom contours. The bottom
gradient between the 75- and 900- fathom contours, a distance
of about 25 miles, is from 5.0 to 3.0 per cent. At the 900-fathom
contour the bottom slopes steeply to a depth of 1,300 fathoms
with gradients as great as 30.3 per cent after which it lessens
to about 2.4 per cent. The submarine knoll existing near the
mouth of the canyon, around which the stream channel has had
to travel 11 miles, is a phenomenon in deflection of submarine
canyon courses. This knoll will evoke an interesting discussion
as to whether it is younger or older than the canyon, or contemporary
with a portion of the canyon’s history. The fact that
the mouth of the canyon including that portion of the canyon
just eastward of the knoll approaches a straight line would
imply, for example, that the canyon was fault-controlled and
that the knoll was a subsequent intrusion occurring at some
time after the canyon was well established.
Bear Seavalley is about 18 miles long between
the 75- and 1,400-fathom contours. Its gradient is about 14
per cent down to the 500-fathom contour, thence 30 per cent
to a depth of 1,000 fathoms after which it levels out from 11
to as low as 2.9 per cent. The name of this feature was supplied
by the writer, all other names shown on the illustration being
in use on the later editions of the Coast and Geodetic Survey
charts of this area. The term “seavalley”, however,
is a recent decision of the United States Board on Geographical
Names and is applied to submarine depressions that are of valley
form but unaccompanied by steep adjacent parallel walls such
as are found in canyons.
Although outside the scope of this article,
it is nevertheless of practical interest to note that another
recent decision is “seamount”. This new term is
being applied more frequently off the West Coast and is used
to denote a submarine elevation of mountain form. As a specific
example, the first feature to receive this designation was a
submarine mountain discovered by the Coast and Geodetic Survey
Ship GUIDE in 1933 about 75 miles west of Point Piedras Blancas,
California. This feature rises from a depth of 1,900 fathoms
to 729 fathoms and has a net elevation above the ocean floor
of 1,171 fathoms or 7,026 feet. It was named “Davidson
Seamount” in honor of George Davidson (1825–1911)
of the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey.
Mendocino and Mattole canyons join at a depth
of around 900 fathoms. Their lengths inshoreward from this point
are 14 miles to the 40-fathom contour and 18 miles to the 10-fathom
contour respectively. Two alternate outlets into the broad region
of the 1,400-fathom contour are possible: one where Bear Seavalley
enters, and the other about nine miles farther westward. The
total lengths, in the case of the longer Mattole Canyon, to
the two outlets are about 39 and 48 miles. Mendocino Canyon
is more direct and has a gradient of about 6.4 per cent from
a depth of 200 to 1, 100 fathoms after which it levels out to
about 2.2 per cent. The gradient along the major portion of
Mattole Canyon is about 5.4 per cent or slightly less. Portions
of the side walls of these two canyons are similar and yet contrasting.
Near the apex of the 400-fathom contour, Mendocino Canyon has
a steep wall slope of about 49 per cent on the north side, whereas
Mattole Canyon has its steeper side slope of about 52 per cent
of the south side where the face of the scarp serves as a side
wall. In the same vicinities the opposing walls of each canyon
are also similar in that they have lesser slopes of 21 and 16
per cent respectively.
Spanish and Delgada canyons are only partially
shown on the illustration. Spanish Canyon is fairly straight
and has a gradient of about 7.2 per cent from the 30- to the
300-fathom contour after which it lessens to about 2.4 per cent.
Delgada’s gradient is about 15 per cent from the 10- to
the 100-fathom contour, thence 11 per cent to the 200-fathom
contour after which it changes to about 2.7 per cent.
The contouring of several features represented
in the illustration has revealed the desirability of additional
development for further geological and seismological researches.
Such additional development will necessarily be more comprehensive
than that needed for purposes of navigation and will be accomplished
by the Coast and Geodetic Survey Ship GUIDE, E.W. Eickelberg
commanding.
The new development will consist briefly of:
1. A zigzag echo sounding line extending along
the fault scarp to ascertain its present unknown western extremity.
2. A system of short, closely-spaced, vertical
cast sounding lines crossing the submarine scarp approximately
normal to the depth curves between the junction of Mattole and
Mendocino canyons and the western limit of the illustration.
These lines will be spaced about five nautical miles apart.
The sounding interval will be as close as 100 meters on the
steepest portion of the scarp. Bottom specimens will also be
obtained at each vertical cast sounding. This development will
permit a more exact determination of the face of the scarp and
will, of course, be intensified if any unusual features, such
as cliffs or terraces, are discovered.
3. Spanish Canyon will be further developed
by a system of lines running approximately at an angle of 45
with the depth curves. Other areas to the northeastward, including
the longest tributary of Eel Canyon will also receive further
development.
While the careful development of these features
and the intimate knowledge obtained from them are of considerabl
scientific value, probably the greatest present value is to
the navigator. Previously in thsi article a short description
was given of the stranding of the Steamer BEAR near Cape Mendocino.
If the mater of that vessel had been provided with a modern
chart of this locality, he would not have made the assumption
that the cape had been safely passed and the disaster probably
would have been averted.
At that period, of course, soundings were obtained
by vertical casts or pressure tubes. Nowadays, sounding is much
simplified by the use of an echo sounding device with which
more and more commercial vessels are being equipped. With such
a device and a modern chart, a ship rounding Cape Mendocino
in fog can determine its position almost as accurately as though
the weather were clear, simply by adjusting the profile of this
unique bottom as given by a continuous line of soundings, to
the chart.
It is pleasant to think that Nature, while
making Cape Mendocino one of the most dangerous points on our
coasts, with its reefs, fogs, and generally unfavorable weather,
has so patterned the submarine topography that the very peculiarities
of its features increase the safety of navigation in this locality.
Following are some remarks by Captain N.H.
Heck concerning the seismological aspects of the submarine scarp.
COMMENT
N.H. Heck, Hydrographic and Geodetic Engineer
Chief, Division of Terrestrial Magnetism and Seismology
U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey
Recent confirmation of early surveys which
indicated a vertical scarp running west from Cape Mendocino
in about latitude 40 18' raises the interesting question as
to whether or not this is an extension of the San Andreas Fault.
Since this means a sharp change in direction of the fault as
it leaves the coast, it is important to introduce the seismic
evidence. It is to be understood that the San Andreas Fault
is a major earth feature extending from the vicinity of Cape
Mendocino through California into Mexico and possibly even farther.
The only similar formation on land, comparable in extent, is
the great fault which begins in northern Syria, extends through
Palestine and across the Red Sea into Africa. It is possible,
however, that the great submarine troughs are similar phenomena.
It is necessary first to appraise the accuracy
of the locations of the known earthquakes of the region. Several
elements are essential. The instrument should be suited for
recording the earthquakes that occur, there should be a proper
distribution of stations, the time scale on the records should
be open so that the time of arrival of an earthquake phase is
accurately known, and the velocities of the earth waves of the
region should be known. If we were discussing the problem in
the vicinity of San Francisco or southern California, these
conditions would be met, but they are far from being met in
the Cape Mendocino region.
During recent years there have been seismographs
at Ferndale and Ukiah, and it is probable that the earthquake
epicenters are reasonably well recorded off Cape Mendocino,
but these are not enough stations for best results; and, since
we are dealing with a geological phenomena, the history should
be as long as possible. Prior to the installation of the two
stations mentioned, only approximations of the epicenter could
be made. A number of vessels reported feeling shocks in the
vicinity, but the difficulty is that no matter what the relation
of the vessel to the epicenter may be, if it feels the shock,
it appears to come directly from beneath the vessel. It is probable
that the recent determinations of epicenters are 10 or 15 miles
in error and the earlier ones in still greater error, so that
the direct association of earthquakes with the well-defined
scarp cannot be made. However, the definition of the scarp is
very important in connection with future more precise determinations.
While the evidence is incomplete there is reason to think that
there is not the same degree of earthquake activity to the northward
of Cape Mendocino, either on land or sea, as there is just south
of that vicinity.
Professor Perry Byerly of the University of
California, in a paper presented at the Richmond meeting in
1938 of the American Association for the Advancement of Science,
made the interesting suggestion that the fault continues only
until it meets the region where there is a transfer from continental
to oceanic crustal conditions (i.e., from 40 km. thickness to
practically zero.) This is a very interesting speculation, and
it is in part supported by the westerly trend of the scarp.
In any case this is an excellent example of
the need for accurate depiction of submarine features in connection
with geological and seismological problems.